Last week we talked a little bit about truth and history, particularly the notion that written history can vary from actual events to the point where fiction is taken as fact. This week, that theme becomes a bit more prevalent, particularly with Dakkan’s observation that there are “too many stories” disparaging the Ermehn for them all to be false. However, assuming some are true, which ones?


And what of Kenosh’s side? These potential misconceptions stem from old rivalries and conflicts well over a hundred years old, but how much falls on the current generations to right the wrongs of the past? Is that even possible with the image the Ermehn have in the lower four kingdoms in contemporary society? Have the Ermehn done anything to deserve a revised history?